Innes v. Innes

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1990-01-17

Cited by 132 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J. We hold today that payments generated by pension benefits that were previously equitably distributed are not “income” for purposes of reconsidering the pensioner’s alimony obligations. Our decision is based on the recent amendment to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, the pre-existing case law and the specific language of the parties’ agreement. <p "b55…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.