Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · Decided 2003-06-17

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendants Cummins Engine Co., Wart-sila NSD North America, Inc., Cummins Wartsila Engine Co., and Case Credit Corp. (collectively “Cummins”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to stay a case pending arbitration and to compel arbitration. Inland Bulk Transfer Co. (“Inland Bulk”) contracted with Cum-mins to pu…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.