Incollingo v. EWING

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1971-01-25

Cited by 315 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part by Mr. Chief Justice Bell: I agree with the Majority that the verdict against Dr. Levin and Dr. Cucinotta must be affirmed. However, I would grant judgment non obstante veredicto for Parke, Davis Company. The Majority correctly frame the issue of Parke, Davis’s liability in terms of the adequacy of the warning given to pres…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.