EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In contrast to the majority, I would not reach the merits of Constance Luongo’s claim for a refund. Instead, I would dismiss her action on the ground that, under 11 U.S.C. § 505 (a)(2)(B), the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over her refund claim. I find that the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction extends only to claims for refu…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.