In the Interest of S.H.A.

Decided 1987-02-27

Cited by 289 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCLUNG, Justice, dissenting. While agreeing with the able dissent of Justice Devany, because there are additional reasons why the majority opinion is erroneous, I file this dissent to explain these reasons. It is well settled that involuntary termination of parental rights involves fundamental constitutional rights. Santosky v. Kramer, <a h…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.