In the Interest of S.A.V.

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1992-10-21

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HECHT, Justice, joined by PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, and CORNYN, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the Court that the district court properly exercised its jurisdiction to modify the provisions of the parties’ Minnesota divorce decree concerning custody and visitation. I do not agree, however — although it is a close question — that the district court had personal jurisdiction ov…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.