In the Interest of M.B.

Decided 1996-07-26

Cited by 124 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CADY, Presiding Judge. This is a consolidated appeal of a review order in a child in need of assistance proceeding and a subsequent order terminating parental rights. The central claim in both appeals is whether the visitation schedule was too restrictive. On our de novo review, we affirm the juvenile court. Christina and Jeff are the parents of Matthew,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.