In the Interest of A.B.

Decided 2011-04-11

Cited by 149 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION BY BOWES, J.: The guardian ad litem appointed to represent B.B., A.B., and M.B. in the underlying dependency proceedings appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying Lancaster County Children and Youth Social Service Agency’s (“CYS”) request to change the children’s permanency goals from reunification to adoption. 1 We affirm. B.B., A.B.,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.