In re V.V.

Decided 2010-07-29

Cited by 146 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice, concurring. I join the opinion of the en banc court in its entirety. I write separately for the limited purpose of emphasizing that the now-vacated panel opinion unnecessarily departed from the governing precedent of In re M.S., 1 which established the Texas state-law standard for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims ari…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.