In Re Tahl

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1969-11-07

Cited by 948 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PETERS, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the exclusion of jurors Sonneborn and Delaney constituted reversible error as to the penalty verdict, and with the majority’s reading of Boykin v. Alabama (1969) <a href="/opinion/107951/boykin-v-alabama/" aria…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.