In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 2002-04-11

Cited by 269 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PER CURIAM. The issue here is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to disqualify Nitla’s counsel, who had reviewed privileged documents that thé trial court ordered the opposing party to produce. The court of appeals issued mandamus, ordering the trial court to disqualify Nitla’s counsel. In re Bank of Am., N.A., <span class="citation…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.