In re Murray

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-07-03

Cited by 1,121 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J., concurring in syllabus and judgment. I concur in the judgment and syllabus of the majority but do so for reasons different from those set forth by the majority in its opinion. Hence, I write separately. There are three prongs to the definition of “final appealable order” in R.C. 2505.02. See, generally, Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. (1989), <span class="citation" da…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.