In re K.H.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2008-09-30

Cited by 254 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lanzinger, J., concurring in judgment only. {¶ 57} Although concurring in judgment, I wish to emphasize further that the majority’s holding rests solely on the existence of clear and convincing evidence to terminate appellants’ parental rights in this case. Nothing more. {¶ 58} This opinion, with its detailed recitation of facts, does not directly address the proposition of law originall…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.