In re D.A.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2007-03-28

Cited by 172 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lanzinger, J. {¶ 1} We accepted this discretionary appeal to determine whether the parental rights of a mentally retarded couple were properly terminated and permanent custody of their son properly awarded to Tuscarawas County Job and Family Services. We reverse. Procedural Facts {¶ 2} In early 2004, appellants voluntarily relinquished custody of their ten-year-old son, D.A., who was hav…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.