In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1985-12-19

Cited by 366 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Meyer, J. A decision of an administrative agency which neither ad *517 heres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious. The order of the Appellate Division confirming the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board tha…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.