In Re Bell

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1942-02-13

Cited by 207 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CABTEB, J., dissenting. — I dissent. In my opinion petitioners are entitled to their release on habeas corpus upon the ground that the provisions of the ordinance under which they were charged and convicted are unconstitutional and void. ■ Since the majority of the court seem to agree that section 2 of the ordinance is invalid, but sustain the validity of the < ="1" label…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.