Idaho Conservation League v. Mumma

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1992-02-26

Cited by 247 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

NOONAN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the judgment, but do not reach the merits. The plaintiffs made no showing that their interests were “actually affected” by the agency action of which they complained. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, — U.S. -, <a href="/opinion/112490/lujan-v-national-wildlife-federation/#3187" aria-description="Citation…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.