Hyde & Drath v. Baker

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1994-05-20

Cited by 222 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the district court properly dismissed a complaint , and imposed sanctions because of repeated failure to attend scheduled depositions. I From 1989 until 1992, plaintiffs-appellants Tungsten Contact Manufacturing Company (“Tungsten”), Grover Investments, Ltd. (“Grover”), World Union Corporation, Ltd. (“W…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.