Hutchins v. District of Columbia

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit · Decided 1998-05-22

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TATEL, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with Judge Rogers that the District of Columbia juvenile curfew implicates a fundamental right to free movement and that the right should be defined without regard to the age of the right- *571 holder. See Rogers Op. at 554-59. Although I still believe that the curfew should be subject to strict scrutiny an…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.