MARSHALL, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court. — The counsel for the appellant objects to the decree of the circuit *88 court oa two grounds. He contends, 1. That this power of attorney does, by its own operation, entitle the plaintiff, for the satisfaction of his debt, to the interest of Rousmanier i…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.