Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1980-12-22

Cited by 346 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

From the opinion

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Appellants S. E. Rykoff and Co., et al (Rykoff) appeal the district court’s determination that the anticompetitive forfeiture clause in the S. E. Rykoff Co. Profit-Sharing Trust Plan (Plan) violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1975). Appellee Humm…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗

Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.