Hulbert v. . Clark

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1891-10-06

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Earl, J. The sole question for our determination is whether the' mortgage continued to be a subsisting lien and could be foreclosed after an action at law upon the notes was barred by the Statute of Limitations. This is an interesting question which has given rise to considerable discussion in the courts of this country and England. We do not, however, deem it difficult of solution.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.