Hughes v. Doherty

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 2005-06-16

Cited by 261 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*103 OPINION OF THE COURT Ciparick, J. The sole issue before this Court is whether the New York City Department of Sanitation (DOS) acted irrationally in determining that the title “oiler” is not in the direct line of promotion to the job titles “crane operator” and “tractor operator” when it refused to allow laid-off DOS crane and tractor operators to…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.