Huggins v. New York City Transit Authority

Decided 1996-03-25

Cited by 123 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*733 The appellant’s motion insofar as it sought a further deposition of the plaintiff concerning questions objected to at his examination before trial was, in effect, an application seeking a ruling on an examination before trial, and an order made upon such an application is not appealable as of right (see, Cruz v Roman Catholic Church for Most Holy Trinity, <span class="citation" data-id…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.