Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2010-09-29

Cited by 192 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Brown, C.J., concurring. {¶ 39} I concur with the majority that no provision of the Insurers Supervision, Rehabilitation, and Liquidation Act (“Liquidation Act”) expressly authorizes payment of interest to any claimant. In the absence of express authorizing statutory language, I am reluctantly constrained to conclude that the superintendent may not pay interest…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.