Howell v. State

Decided 2004-11-16

Cited by 152 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, J., concurring and dissenting. I concur in the majority decision insofar as it holds that neither Apprendi v. New *468 Jersey, 1 nor Ring v. Arizona 2 mandates a jury trial on mental retardation. I also agree with the majori…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.