Houghton v. Hall

Decided 1933-03-27

Cited by 111 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ODOM, Justice (dissenting). *267 I think the court has erred in its interpretation of article 2334 of the Civil Code, as finally re-enacted by Act No. 186 of 1920. It is so clear to me that under the present law, a wife’s “earnings when carrying on a business, trade, occupation or indu…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.