Hood v. Texas Indemnity Insurance

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1948-02-11

Cited by 195 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Smedley, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. It is erroneous in two important points that control the decision: First, in its ruling that the neurosis from which petitioner suffered as described in Dr. Cline’s testimony is compensable; and second, in its conclusion that Dr. Cline expressed the opinion that petitioner…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.