Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANK

Decided 2006-06-13

Cited by 119 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 53. (dissenting). f — ¶ 54. I begin with a simple premise: ourjobisto clarify, not to confuse the law. ¶ 55. Thus, I am perplexed by the majority's approach here. It is as though the majority initially wrote the opinion limiting liability based on duty. See majority op., ¶¶ 20-40. Then, recognizing that such an approach is inconsistent wit…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.