Hinojos-Mendoza v. People

Decided 2007-09-10

Cited by 120 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice MARTINEZ, dissenting. I agree with the majority that lab reports are testimonial statements subject to Sixth Amendment protections. However, I disagree with the majority's holding that section 16-3-309(5), C.R.S. (2006), 9 can be constitutionally applied without a proper waiver. In People v. Mojica-Simental, we unanimously concluded that section 16-8-309(5) is facially constitut…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.