Hillis v. Department of Ecology

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1997-03-06

Cited by 139 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alexander, J. (concurring in concurrence/dissent) — I agree with the concurrence/dissent of Justice Sanders. I choose to write specially because I wish to indicate that I am not unsympathetic with the Department of Ecology’s (DOE) claim that it lacks sufficient funds and, as a consequence, adequate staff to timely process the many water right applications that have been, and most likely will conti…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.