Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-04-06

Cited by 203 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. Appellants present the following three issues for our determination: whether a security alarm system company owes a duty of protection to the employee of a commercial establishment under a contract between the commercial establishment and the security alarm system company for the protection of the commercial establishment after it is closed for the day; whether the employee is a third-party intended beneficiary or an i…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.