Hertog v. City of Seattle

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1999-06-24

Cited by 306 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alexander, J. (concurring/dissenting) — The majority concludes that the City of Seattle and its probation counselors “have a duty to control municipal court probationers” in order “to protect others from reasonably foreseeable harm resulting from the probationers’ dangerous propensities.” Majority op. at 281. With that determination I agree. I part company with the majority, however, insofar as it holds that…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.