Hernandez v. New York

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1991-05-28

Cited by 4,159 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Marshall joins, dissenting. A violation of the Equal Protection Clause requires wl at our cases characterize as proof of “discriminatory purpose.” By definition, however, a prima facie case is one that is established by the requisite proof of invidious intent. Unless *376 the prosecutor comes forward with an explanation…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.