Hernandez v. Gulf Group Lloyds

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1994-04-28

Cited by 307 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ENOCH, Justice, dissenting. If this were a breach of contract case, I would agree that for Gulf Group to avoid its duty to cover the Hernandezes’ underinsured claim, it would have to show a loss of “expected benefit.” However, this case is not about a breach of contract. This case is about coverage. The insuring agreement states: This insurance does not apply:</…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.