Hernandez v. City of Pomona

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2009-05-28

Cited by 165 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CORRIGAN, J., Concurring. I concur, but write separately to express misgivings about the path the litigation has taken in this case. I agree that plaintiffs’ state claims here are foreclosed by a combination of issue preclusion and the application of law to conceded facts. However, I do not believe *524 that defendants and state courts should be required to relitigate th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.