Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-Appellant

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · Decided 1985-03-19

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

VANCE, Circuit Judge: Appellant Friedlander contends that the district court erred in granting defendant Timex’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for failure to plead fraud with particularity as required by Fed.R. Civ.P. 9(b). Because we find that appellant deliberately chose to forego his opportunity to cure the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.