OPINION ODOM, Judge. Appellant was convicted of burglary; punishment, enhanced under Article 63, V.A.P.C., was assessed at life. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. In his first ground of error, appellant asserts: “The trial court committed reversible error in…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.