Paul E. DANIELSON, Justice, concurring. I agree that the circuit court should be affirmed; however, because I reach my conclusion on the first point differently, I concur. It is my opinion that Bennett indeed should have filed a motion requesting an in camera hearing pursuant to Arkansas’s rape-shield statute. That being said, under Strickland v.…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.