Health Call of Detroit v. Atrium Home & Health Care Services, Inc

Decided 2005-11-29

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SAWYER, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the result and reasoning contained in Judge MURPHY’s opinion, especially its conclusion: We conclude that a blanket rule limiting recovery to nominal damages as a matter of law in all actions arising out of or related to the termination of at-will contracts is not legally sound. There may exi…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.