Hawks v. Hamill

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1933-01-09

Cited by 188 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Cardozo delivered the. opinion of the Court. The respondents, claiming to be the owners of a perpetual franchise to collect tolls for the use of a bridge across, the Canadian River, brought suit in the United States District Court against the members of the State Highway Commission of Oklahoma, the Attorney General of that State, the County Attorneys…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.