Havner v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1992-02-26

Cited by 329 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PHILLIPS, Justice, concurring. Although I share to some extent the concerns expressed by the dissent regarding the excessive use of marginal “experts” in modern trial practice, I believe that the testimony of the fact witnesses, taken together, constitutes more than a scintilla of evidence to support the verdict in this case for the Havners. Accordingly, I join in the court’s judgment. The…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.