Harris v. Niehaus

Decided 1993-06-29

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BENTON, Judge, concurring in the result in part and dissenting in part. The principal opinion finds that this case should not have been submitted to the jury under either a failure-to-warn or a failure-to-protect theory. As to failure-to-warn, this holding is eminently correct because no evidence suggests that the trustees could have warned either the mother or children in a wa…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.