Harris v. Commonwealth

Decided 1998-06-16

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BENTON, Judge, dissenting. I would hold that the scope of the detention exceeded a Terry stop and that the ensuing questioning constituted custodial interrogation for Miranda purposes. A reasonable person, who was detained in the manner James E. Harris, Jr., was detained, would have believed he or she was “in custody” prior to the time the officer…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.