Hamasaki v. Flotho

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1952-10-09

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

EDMONDS, J. I concur in the judgment. As I understand the rule now stated and applied, a plaintiff under the circumstances here shown may not, by limiting the scope of his motion for a new trial, restrict the action of the court in ruling upon it. However, the language of the opinion is inconsistent with the decision. It is said: ā€œ [I] f the plaintiff does not wish a complete new trial, if he cannot have a p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.