Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1908-02-24

Cited by 129 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Moody, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The condemnation of land in this case has been held by the courts of Virginia to be authorized by the constitution and laws of that State,, and we have no right to review that aspect of the decision. The law of Virginia permits no exercise of the right of eminent doma…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.