H.G. Sledge, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co.

Decided 2000-11-09

Cited by 169 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice. The issue before us concerns the proper scope of the notice provision of the Railroad Commission’s rule 37 related to well spacing. See 16 Tex.Admin.Code § 3.37(a)(2) (2000). This dispute arose when the Railroad Commission (“the Commission”) denied a complaint filed by The Prospective Investment and Trading Company, Ltd. (“PITCO”), wh…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.