Guy v. Liederbach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1983-04-29

Cited by 333 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ROBERTS, Chief Justice, dissenting. Although I agree with the majority that appellee’s complaint fails to state a cause of action in trespass, I do not agree that appellee has a cognizable cause of action in assumpsit. Hence I dissent. Appellee’s complaint alleges that, “in exchange for valuable consideration,” appellant agreed with decedent Kent that appellant would draft a will naming appel…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.