Guerrero v. RJM ACQUISITIONS LLC

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2007-08-23

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part: I agree with much of the majority’s opinion. However, I disagree with its conclusion that a communication between a debt collector and a debtor’s attorney is not actionable as a “false, deceptive, or misleading representation” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or “Act”). 15 U.S.C. § 1…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.