Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Michigan · Decided 2005-06-14

Cited by 180 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KELLY, J. odissenting). Today the Court reaches the extraordinary conclusion that food is not always necessary for an injured person’s care. The Court concludes that food is “completely unrelated to [an injured person’s] ‘care, recovery, or rehabilitation’ ” if provided in a home, although it is both necessary and reimbursable if provided in an institution. Ante at 536.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.